CAT

Caterpillar Price

CAT
$917.61
+$20.16(+2.24%)

*Data last updated: 2026-05-11 17:01 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-05-11 17:01, Caterpillar (CAT) is priced at $917.61, with a total market cap of $413.39B, a P/E ratio of 30.11, and a dividend yield of 0.67%. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $895.00 and $918.26. The current price is 2.52% above the day's low and 0.07% below the day's high, with a trading volume of 1.59M. Over the past 52 weeks, CAT has traded between $339.50 to $931.34, and the current price is -1.47% away from the 52-week high.

CAT Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$895.69
Market Cap$413.39B
Volume1.59M
P/E Ratio30.11
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.67%
Dividend Amount$1.51
Diluted EPS (TTM)20.32
Net Income (FY)$8.87B
Revenue (FY)$67.58B
Earnings Date2026-08-04
EPS Estimate6.04
Revenue Estimate$18.92B
Shares Outstanding461.54M
Beta (1Y)1.625
Ex-Dividend Date2026-04-20
Dividend Payment Date2026-05-19

About CAT

Caterpillar Inc. manufactures and sells construction and mining equipment, diesel and natural gas engines, and industrial gas turbines worldwide. Its Construction Industries segment offers asphalt pavers, backhoe loaders, compactors, cold planers, compact track and multi-terrain loaders, excavators, motorgraders, pipelayers, road reclaimers, site prep tractors, skid steer loaders, telehandlers, and utility vehicles; mini, small, medium, and large excavators; compact, small, and medium wheel loaders; track-type tractors and loaders; and wheel excavators. The Resource Industries segment provides electric rope shovels, draglines, hydraulic shovels, rotary drills, hard rock vehicles, track-type tractors, mining trucks, longwall miners, wheel loaders, off-highway trucks, articulated trucks, wheel tractor scrapers, wheel dozers, fleet management, landfill compactors, soil compactors, machinery components, autonomous ready vehicles and solutions, select work tools, and safety services and mining performance solutions. The Energy & Transportation segment offers reciprocating engines, generator sets, integrated systems and solutions, turbines and turbine-related services, remanufactured reciprocating engines and components, centrifugal gas compressors, diesel-electric locomotives and components, and other rail-related products and services for marine, oil and gas, industrial, and electric power generation sectors. The company's Financial Products segment provides operating and finance leases, installment sale contracts, working capital loans, and wholesale financing plans; and insurance and risk management products for vehicles, power generation facilities, and marine vessels. The All Other operating segment manufactures filters and fluids, undercarriage, ground engaging tools, etc. The company was formerly known as Caterpillar Tractor Co. and changed its name to Caterpillar Inc. in 1986. The company was founded in 1925 and is headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois.
SectorIndustrials
IndustryAgricultural - Machinery
CEOJoseph E. Creed
HeadquartersIrving,TX,US
Employees (FY)51.60K
Average Revenue (1Y)$1.30M
Net Income per Employee$171.95K

Learn More about Caterpillar (CAT)

Caterpillar (CAT) FAQ

What's the stock price of Caterpillar (CAT) today?

x
Caterpillar (CAT) is currently trading at $917.61, with a 24h change of +2.24%. The 52-week trading range is $339.50–$931.34.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Caterpillar (CAT)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Caterpillar (CAT)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Caterpillar (CAT)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Caterpillar (CAT)?

x

Should you buy or sell Caterpillar (CAT) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Caterpillar (CAT)?

x

How to buy Caterpillar (CAT) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Caterpillar (CAT) Latest News

2026-04-03 09:57Blue Cat Owl Capital’s stock hits a new low as a $5.4 billion redemption wave sparks panic in private creditGate News message. On April 2, Blue Owl Capital (OWL)’s share price fell to a historical low of $7.95. Redemption requests for two private credit funds under the company surged—reaching as much as $5.4 billion in just the first quarter. The company’s flagship fund, OCIC, with a size of $36 billion, received redemption requests equivalent to 21.9% of issued shares, while the OTIC fund, focused on the technology sector, saw redemption requests as high as 40.7%. The company set redemption caps at 5% for both. As investors’ confidence in the private credit industry declines, Blue Owl’s market value has shrunk by more than 40% year to date. In a letter to shareholders, Blue Owl stated that there is a clear disconnect between public discussion of private credit and the performance of actual investment portfolios. Apollo Global Management and BlackRock have also taken similar measures by limiting fund redemption amounts to cope with capital outflows. Bloomberg data shows that as of the end of March, redemption requests totaling about $13 billion were submitted across a dozen or so private credit funds. Analysts believe that market turmoil, along with concerns about potential risks posed by AI-driven software borrowers, has placed private capital managers under unprecedented pressure, prompting investors to exit. In the short term, Blue Owl Capital’s liquidity management will become a key focus for the market. Investors need to be alert to the impact that redemption limits may have on overall returns and cash flow, while also assessing the overall risks facing the private credit industry. With more large-scale redemption events being exposed, the industry may undergo structural adjustments, and pressure on high-leverage funds could further spread to the broader capital markets.2026-03-05 08:01Can Bitcoin's short-term surge continue? Experts warn that the rebound may be a "dead cat bounce"March 5 News: Bitcoin has recently rebounded strongly, temporarily recouping most of the losses from the past few weeks. However, some market analysts warn that this rally may just be a "dead cat bounce." Industry expert Arthur Hayes stated that the current Bitcoin rebound is short-lived and fragile, potentially paving the way for the next decline in the near term. In the past 24 hours, Bitcoin's price has risen over 6%, reaching $72,588, with a weekly increase of approximately 6.37%, but it remains down 7.5% for the month. Hayes pointed out that Bitcoin's recent sell-off is closely related to structured product trading strategies tied to the BlackRock iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT). He warned that Bitcoin still remains highly correlated with the performance of U.S. SaaS technology companies and has not yet decoupled from broader tech sector risks, making its short-term trend uncertain. Another analyst, CrediBULL Crypto, also remains cautious about Bitcoin's short-term outlook. He believes Bitcoin may be forming a medium- to long-term bottom above $50,000, but in the short term, it could continue to fluctuate within a range, facing risks of either upward movement or a pullback at any time. Notably, Bitcoin's rebound has coincided with a rise in gold prices, indicating that investors are seeking safe-haven assets amid current geopolitical tensions and market volatility. The Trump administration's recent announcement of a multi-million dollar gold deal with Venezuela has also somewhat boosted risk aversion sentiment. Market observers warn that although ETF capital inflows and short-term buying support Bitcoin's rebound, investors should remain alert to potential pullback risks. Analysts recommend closely monitoring key price levels to determine whether Bitcoin can truly shake off short-term volatility and enter a new bull market.2026-02-02 06:25Leverage liquidations trigger a "deep squat" in metals, with the metal market awaiting a complete reshuffle of speculative positionsOdaily Planet Daily News: Pepperstone strategist Michael Brown stated that the metal market sell-off that began last Friday continued into Asian trading hours on Monday, with gold, silver, and copper all experiencing significant declines. He pointed out that, similar to the previous rally, the current correction also exhibits the characteristics of "a sharp and rapid decline." He added that the market is very likely to see a so-called "dead cat bounce" soon. However, from a long-term perspective, the bullish logic remains solid: central banks and retail demand are still healthy, and for investors seeking geopolitical hedges, precious metals will still be the preferred choice over the US dollar or US Treasuries. The key moving forward is whether the market bubble has been sufficiently deflated and whether speculative positions have been fully cleared, allowing the fundamentals to once again dominate price movements. (Jin10)2025-12-28 10:32Analyst: Recently, Bitcoin's "dead cat bounce" may be driven by leverage, and the risk of further price decline still exists.ChainCatcher 消息,链上分析师 Ali(@alicharts)在 X 平台发文分析指出,近期比特币市场呈现“死猫反弹”状态,从链上数据来看流入加密货币市场的资金持续下降,比特币 ETF 过去两周净流出近 10 亿美元,目前市场上看到的任何反弹都可能是杠杆驱动,而非现货需求支撑,所以价格进一步走低的风险依然存在。2025-12-08 11:04Peter Brandt and the "world's highest IQ individual" give opposing predictions for Bitcoin's December performanceAs Bitcoin enters a key time window in the second week of December, two analysts with vastly different backgrounds have offered completely opposite outlooks. One is the legendary trader Peter Brandt, who has decades of experience, and the other is YoungHoon Kim, known as the “world’s highest IQ individual” with an IQ of 276. Their disagreement highlights that even those with top-level intelligence or extensive expertise may reach entirely different conclusions about the crypto market. Brandt believes that Bitcoin’s current rebound is merely a retest of an “expanding top pattern.” He points out that this pattern typically signals waning upward momentum and that prices may drop sharply in the future. According to his technical analysis, Bitcoin could surge to $102,000 in the short term, but may then pull back to around $58,840. He has repeatedly warned that the current market shows characteristics of a “dead cat bounce,” cautioning investors against excessive optimism. In stark contrast, YoungHoon Kim thinks the current dip is nothing more than short-term noise caused by whale manipulation. From a game theory perspective, he explains that such manipulation may dissipate within a week, after which Bitcoin could once again challenge its all-time highs. The crypto analysis account Bull Theory also noted that the recent rapid rebound of Bitcoin from $87,700 to $91,200 fits the typical low-liquidity weekend washout pattern. The growing divergence among investors is also closely tied to upcoming macro events. With the FOMC meeting approaching, the market widely expects short-term volatility to intensify. In the run-up to the past two rate cuts (September 17 and October 29), Bitcoin showed a pattern of “rising first, a small rebound after the announcement, followed by a sharp drop,” suggesting that policy meetings could once again become key price triggers. With technical and game theory camps at odds, the second week of December may be a critical moment to test both bullish and bearish views, and the market will soon provide the answer.

Hot Posts About Caterpillar (CAT)

LiquidationAlert

LiquidationAlert

1 hours ago
I've been thinking a lot about what's actually happening in crypto right now, and honestly, it's kind of fascinating in a weird way. There's this strange K-shaped structure emerging that most people don't quite grasp yet. On one hand, we're seeing genuinely successful projects. Polymarket is thriving. Prediction markets have basically become a real infrastructure play, and you've got this duopoly forming between Kalshi and Polymarket that actually works. Stablecoins aren't some theoretical experiment anymore—they're becoming real money infrastructure. These things are delivering on what crypto promised. They're not hypothetical anymore. But here's the frustration part: none of this success is translating into returns for regular investors through public tokens. You look at Polymarket crushing it, and you think, "Okay, how do I invest in this?" Well, you can't, unless you're in the club. It's still private. Same with Stripe. These projects are printing value but the average person has zero access. That's the K-shape. Success and failure diverging completely. The crypto industry is actually delivering on a lot of its promises now. Hyperliquid is genuinely cool. Trade XYZ is doing real things. These aren't vaporware. But the average investor is stuck watching from outside while the actual value creation happens in private rounds. It's genuinely frustrating, and I think people feel that frustration even if they can't quite articulate it. What keeps me interested though is that capital keeps flowing onto the blockchain. As long as that happens, the next cycle of excitement becomes almost inevitable. I've been pretty pessimistic about various things over the years, and honestly, pessimism has never actually helped me. It's just made me sad. So I'm trying to take a longer view now. The thing that worries me most about DeFi right now is AI. Not in some distant sci-fi way—I mean right now. Something like Anthropic's capabilities could genuinely turn DeFi into a financial bounty system. Once these models are widely distributed, attackers will exploit them, but so will the people building these systems. DeFi might need to completely reinvent itself. That's both exciting and terrifying. But here's what's wild: AI is also changing the entire startup equation. You can now start a business solo and potentially hit billion-dollar outcomes in months. We're seeing this with things like OpenClaw—one person generating billions in revenue in like a month. That's not hyperbole, that's actually happening. The economic model for early employees is completely different now too. Used to be you'd join a startup and take massive risk for maybe one-twentieth of founder returns. Now companies need fewer people, raise less capital, have less dilution, and exit faster. The risk-reward for early employees is actually inverted now. If I were young today, I'd probably do one of two things: either build something solo or with a couple friends that would've needed 10-20 people five years ago, or find the smartest person I know and do everything possible to help them succeed. The barriers that used to exist just aren't there anymore. This connects to something bigger though. The private equity market is honestly broken in a way that violates basic capitalist promises. SpaceX, Anthropic, OpenAI—these companies went from nothing to trillion-dollar valuations. Almost nobody outside the elite club got to participate in that wealth creation. It's like the entire promise of capitalism—that if you work hard and invest wisely, you can share in growth—just evaporated. You can't buy SpaceX stock. You can't invest in OpenAI at a reasonable valuation. You're locked out. The public markets are becoming a liquidity provider of last resort. You get to buy in at peak valuations after all the real value creation already happened. It's the same thing happening in crypto, honestly. VC rounds get massive, tokens launch at $16 billion FDV when they were $100 million two days prior. It feels like a broken promise. Here's where airdrops actually become interesting though. Yeah, they look absurd on the surface—people pretending to use products they don't care about just to farm tokens. But occasionally you get something like Hyperliquid where users actually believe in the product and hold even after getting tokens. That's different. Now imagine applying that model to regular consumer companies. Early Facebook users created massive value—they launched the product, gave feedback, built network effects. But they got nothing except the ability to use Facebook. What if they'd gotten actual equity? What if that airdrop model worked for real startups? That's actually capitalism's answer to universal basic income. You participate in economic activity, and if you're a serious user, you capture some of the value you created. Cryptocurrency can do this globally in a way nothing else can. The first real company that does this properly will need to be incredibly bold. Hyperliquid is probably the best case study of how powerful this can be. I've noticed something about how people experience crypto though. You live so intensely in the present moment that your current emotions feel absolutely real and permanent. But then you look back three months and realize you felt completely opposite. It's wild. I went to the dentist once and he mentioned he had 80% of his portfolio in MicroStrategy and 20% in Palantir. This guy was probably in his 70s, not some crypto Twitter person. That's when I realized Bitcoin had actually broken through into the real world. Before that I kind of thought crypto was this hallucination I had while sitting at home. What's interesting now is how sentiment around Saylor has shifted. Used to be "Saylor buying Bitcoin is great news." Now when prices drop, people see it as a warning sign. When prices go up, suddenly "Saylor is awesome again." The emotional whiplash is intense. It's the same with everything—one day something seems impossible, the next day it's obvious. NFTs are the perfect example. I know people who bought ICOs in 2017, then one failed and they decided all crypto was a scam. Then NFTs came along and suddenly they were like "No, this is different, I'm collecting art." Their entire worldview flipped because Art Blocks existed. The pattern is consistent though. Every major entry point in crypto has had the same characteristic: ordinary people made real money in a short timeframe, and it was accessible to everyone. 2013 had the altcoin cycle. 2017 was ICOs—you needed Ethereum because it was the base pair. 2021 had DeFi summer and NFTs. 2023 to now has been the meme cycle. Each time, regular people could actually profit. That's what brings waves of new participants. AI is giving off similar vibes now. People imagine buying a Mac Mini, installing some AI model, and having it run a business for them earning $100 million. That "side hustle that makes you rich" fantasy is incredibly powerful. Will crypto have something similar again? Has the brand been too damaged? Will it take 5-10 years? I don't know. But history doesn't have a reason not to repeat itself. Human creativity is too powerful. I think what new things like on-chain stocks, tokenized stocks, Hyperliquid's perpetual contracts, and Trade XYZ can do is bring new capital onto the blockchain and make people comfortable using blockchain infrastructure. If you're a traditional trader suddenly using Hyperliquid, you're learning how blockchain works. That's powerful. You might not care about crypto ideology, but you're now on-chain. If huge amounts of capital concentrate on-chain and traditional asset volatility decreases, that capital will look for new opportunities. People will invent new DeFi, new things we can't imagine yet. The traders who actually succeed long-term have something in common: extreme self-motivation. They don't just read crypto Twitter and copy strategies. They think from first principles about how things affect markets and why. They document their decisions. They reflect on results. They constantly update their mental models. It's like they're adding training data to themselves. I remember my buy wall thing that people made into legend. Honestly, it wasn't that cool. I was home in London, market crashed hard around 1 AM, I woke up to price alerts, saw a massive red candle, thought it looked like a bottom, and put in a buy order at $4,600 with basically all my stablecoin balance. Then I tweeted about it and went to sleep. Most of the order never filled. I got lucky with timing, that's all. I get genuinely excited when markets drop 50-60% in one candle because that means people are being forced to sell, not choosing to. That's when you can buy from people who wouldn't normally sell. It's an opportunity. But I had conviction that the macro cycle had bottomed. Even if prices kept falling, I felt the price was acceptable. People got fixated on the story, but it was mostly luck. And my net worth wasn't huge—it was just all my on-chain money, and most of it didn't even execute. The toxic thing about crypto is the comparison trap. Even if you're a millionaire, you look at someone else making more and feel like a failure. I felt that in 2021 when Three Arrows Capital seemed to explode onto the scene and their net worth exceeded mine by multiples. I'd been trading since 2012 but suddenly I'm doubting myself. Was I stupid? Not taking enough risk? Not smart enough? That mindset is genuinely toxic. But here's what I learned: don't compare yourself to some perfect version who makes all the right calls. Don't use your historical peak net worth as your benchmark. Twenty percent annually is already elite-level returns in the world. The people who actually preserve wealth are those satisfied with what they have. That's the real skill. When I think about the greatest traders I know, everyone has their high season. Su Zhu in 2021 was definitely top-five. He had this heroic trading period, even sold at the top. Problem was he re-bought with too much leverage too early and got liquidated in the downturn. GCR is also top-five. He's like a smart asset, playing psychological games. He spreads rumors about himself to keep others away from his real alpha. People think he has inside sources at major exchanges, but maybe he's just trying to discourage competitors from finding the actual API or data path he uses. Light is definitely top-tier too. 2025 could be his best year. These traders have extreme self-discipline. They don't use leverage much if at all. They're cautious but consistent. I'm probably closer to that type—I've only been completely risk-on maybe four or five times in my life. I don't regret becoming Cobie, honestly. A lot of my life exists because of that Twitter account. It would be ungrateful to regret it. I occasionally regret podcasting because the upside is limited but downside risk is real. There were some weird people, even stalkers showing up near my place. But I rarely go out, spend most of my time in places where nobody reads my content, and I cut my hair short so I'm harder to recognize. I was pretty lost when I first got into crypto at 24-25, doing random startups with no idea what I wanted. Crypto channeled that wandering energy into something interesting. It's like a fun financial hobby, a game where you try to do your best and learn. For people feeling lost right now about what to do next: take a long-term view. Look five or ten years ahead. If you genuinely believe something in crypto will be important then, allocate capital based on that belief. If you're pessimistic about the whole industry and only staying for past thrills, switch hobbies. Try Pokemon cards, sports cards, learning AI development. If you truly don't believe in crypto's future but you're still trading every day causing yourself pain, why are you here? The crypto industry is a marathon, not a sprint. People think they'll get rich in three months. Wealth accumulation is slower. You might need four or five years before seeing real breakthrough. If you don't believe in what you're doing, those years will be torture because you'll doubt yourself constantly. Don't listen to internet randoms, especially ones with cat avatars or broccoli hair. I think helping people is genuinely good. Yeah, I've been betrayed because I assume people have good intentions like me. But if I wish someone had helped me in a situation I've been through, then helping others now, staying optimistic, connecting with people—that makes life richer and more interesting. That's a wonderful way to live. The financial media space is getting interesting too. You're seeing another K-shape forming. Podcasts like Call Her Daddy or Joe Rogan have millions of listeners but low incremental value per user—maybe $3 in product sales. But niche financial media reaches smaller audiences with extremely valuable users. Each user might be worth $10,000 instead of $3. That's the interesting dynamic. I think in the next three to five years, a financial-native content creator will emerge who becomes representative of a trend. They'll probably publicly share their holdings, showcase their life and market ups and downs, present what many experience but haven't been expressed in a cool way. Strong personal charisma, genuinely skilled at markets. If the timing is right, someone producing excellent content in a good year could become ten times bigger than Roaring Kitty. Of course, they could also cause market disruption and end up in jail, so include a disclaimer if you interview them. Bottom line: I believe crypto will be important in the future. I've been bullish since 2012. The industry is delivering on promises. Capital keeps flowing on-chain. Airdrops and on-chain ownership models can redistribute value in ways traditional finance never could. Yes, there are risks. Yes, AI threatens DeFi. Yes, wealth inequality is accelerating. But human creativity is powerful, and history repeats. Something new will emerge that lets regular people profit again. When it does, waves of participants will follow. That's how this works. That's how it's always worked.
0
0
0
0
mev_me_maybe

mev_me_maybe

1 hours ago
Interesting regulatory observation that caught my attention recently. Singapore's CPIB has been pretty vocal about how cryptocurrencies are making their corruption investigations way more complicated. They released some data showing that bribery cases have started incorporating crypto assets, and honestly, it's becoming a real headache for law enforcement. Here's what makes it tricky from an investigator's standpoint: these digital assets exist on virtual networks, so tracking and seizing them is exponentially harder than dealing with traditional money trails. Add to that the fact that people involved typically use multiple devices, and you're looking at a significantly more complex evidence collection process. The CPIB Singapore team has to deal with this constantly now. What's probably even more challenging is the cross-border angle. When crypto gets involved in corruption cases, you're not just dealing with local investigation anymore. Authorities need to coordinate with overseas law enforcement to piece together the full picture, which introduces another layer of complexity. It's basically a game of international cat and mouse. That said, the CPIB Singapore isn't sitting idle. They've actually set up a dedicated team specifically for this stuff, and they've invested in the capability to track and analyze cryptocurrency flows. They're continuously adapting their methods to keep up with how the tactics are evolving. It's a bit of an arms race between investigators and those trying to hide their tracks. The broader takeaway here is that as technologies advance, so do the challenges for law enforcement globally. The CPIB and other authorities are clearly focused on staying ahead of these trends, especially in an environment where international cooperation on anti-corruption is becoming increasingly important. Worth keeping an eye on how these regulatory approaches continue to develop.
0
0
0
0