IBIT

iShares Bitcoin Trust Price

IBIT
$46.23
+$0.76(+1.67%)

*Data last updated: 2026-05-11 16:59 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-05-11 16:59, iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) is priced at $46.23, with a total market cap of $76.00B, a P/E ratio of 0.00, and a dividend yield of 0.00%. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $45.55 and $46.42. The current price is 1.49% above the day's low and 0.40% below the day's high, with a trading volume of 24.59M. Over the past 52 weeks, IBIT has traded between $39.52 to $47.38, and the current price is -2.42% away from the 52-week high.

IBIT Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$45.40
Market Cap$76.00B
Volume24.59M
P/E Ratio0.00
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%
Net Income (FY)$0.00
Revenue (FY)$0.00
Revenue Estimate$0.00
Shares Outstanding1.67B
Beta (1Y)2.1775267

About IBIT

The iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF seeks to reflect generally the performance of the price of bitcoin.The iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF is not an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and therefore is not subject to the same regulatory requirements as mutual funds or ETFs registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The Trust is not a commodity pool for purposes of the Commodity Exchange Act. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risk factors and other information included in the prospectus.
SectorFinancial Services
IndustryAsset Management
CEOShannon Ghia
HeadquartersNew York,NY,US
Official Websitehttp://www.iShares.com

Learn More about iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)

iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) FAQ

What's the stock price of iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) today?

x
iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) is currently trading at $46.23, with a 24h change of +1.67%. The 52-week trading range is $39.52–$47.38.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)?

x

Should you buy or sell iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)?

x

How to buy iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) Latest News

2026-05-11 12:16Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) Hits $6.5B in Assets in 36 Days, Breaking IBIT RecordAccording to Bloomberg analyst Eric Balchunas, Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) surpassed $6.5 billion in assets in just 36 days, breaking the previous record held by BlackRock's Bitcoin spot ETF IBIT, which took 43 days to reach the same milestone. DRAM rose 13% on Friday and attracted approximately $1 billion in inflows, driving its rapid asset growth.2026-05-11 03:21Bitcoin Spot ETFs See $623M Net Inflows Last Week, Marking 6th Consecutive Week of GainsAccording to ChainCatcher and SoSoValue data, Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded net inflows of $623 million last week, extending a six-week streak of consecutive inflows. BlackRock's IBIT led the category with $596 million in weekly net inflows, bringing its total historical inflows to $66.1 billion. The combined assets under management across all Bitcoin spot ETFs reached $106.61 billion, with cumulative net inflows totaling $59.34 billion since inception. Ark & 21Shares' ARKB followed with $53.09 million in net inflows for the week, while Grayscale's GBTC experienced the largest outflows at $62.28 million.2026-05-08 03:16Bitcoin Spot ETFs See $268.46M Net Outflows Yesterday, Led by Fidelity FBTCAccording to Trader T, Bitcoin spot ETFs saw net outflows of $268.46 million yesterday (May 7), ending the previous day's inflow momentum. Fidelity's FBTC recorded the largest outflow at $128.99 million, followed by BlackRock's IBIT with $98.02 million in net outflows.2026-05-07 21:32BlackRock's IBIT Attracts $8B in Q1 2026 Inflows Despite 25% Bitcoin DrawdownAccording to Crypto Times, BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) held roughly $65 billion in net assets as of May 2026, making it the largest spot Bitcoin ETF globally. The fund recorded over $8 billion in net inflows during Q1 2026, even as Bitcoin prices fell approximately 25%, demonstrating sustained institutional conviction during market downturns. Institutional investors have driven roughly 65% of cumulative spot Bitcoin ETF inflows since IBIT's January 2024 launch, with pension funds, endowments, and sovereign wealth funds now holding significant positions. At the December 2025 DealBook Summit, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink characterized Bitcoin as an "asset of fear," citing investor concerns about currency debasement and geopolitical instability—a framing that aligns with traditional institutional rationales for holding defensive assets.2026-05-07 04:40US Spot Bitcoin ETFs Draw $532 Million in Daily Inflows as Institutional Buying AcceleratesAccording to Farside Investors, U.S. spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds recorded $532.2 million in net inflows on Monday as Bitcoin held above the $80,000 level. BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) led with $335 million, followed by Fidelity's FBTC at $184 million and Morgan Stanley's MSBT at $12.2 million. The inflow marked one of the strongest single-day totals since February, extending a recovery trend that saw $629.8 million in inflows on May 1 following weaker flows in April.

Hot Posts About iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT)

RugResistant

RugResistant

14 minutes ago
Honestly, this recent Bitcoin crash has been wild precisely because there's no obvious culprit. We're seeing oversold conditions that rank third in Bitcoin's entire history, yet nobody can point to a single smoking gun. That's what makes this whole situation so unsettling—it feels less like a typical black swan event and more like a perfect storm nobody saw coming. Macro headwinds, Fed hawkishness recalibration, liquidity tightening, leverage cascades—sure, all of that explains part of the move. But some of the sharpest market minds are floating theories that go way deeper. Let me break down four of the most compelling ones. First up is the cross-market bloodbath angle. Franklin Bi from Pantera Capital dropped a theory that's been rattling around my head: what if this wasn't crypto traders at all, but some massive Asian entity operating outside the crypto ecosystem? Think about it—they'd have minimal counterparties visible to on-chain observers, so nobody would see them coming. According to Bi's reasoning, they were running leveraged plays and market making on major exchanges, got caught in the yen carry trade unwind, hit a liquidity wall, got maybe 90 days breathing room, then failed to recover losses through alternative markets like gold and silver. By this week, they had no choice but to liquidate. That's a real black swan scenario—traditional finance spillover hitting crypto hard. Yen carry trades are genuinely massive for global liquidity. For years, the arbitrage was simple: borrow yen at near-zero rates, swap into dollars, dump it into high-yield stuff. Bitcoin, being one of the most liquidity-sensitive assets on the planet, becomes the preferred ATM when these funds need to exit. And yeah, the timing tracks—Bitcoin's worst action happened during Asian hours. Parker White from DeFi Dev Corp takes this further. He's flagging that BlackRock's IBIT saw 10.7 billion in volume on February 5th—literally double the previous record. Options premiums hit 900 million, also a record. IBIT is now the dominant Bitcoin options venue. What if some massive IBIT holder got forced into liquidation? White suspects Hong Kong-based funds that allocated everything—sometimes literally 100%—to IBIT through segregated margin structures. They might've been running yen-financed leverage on options, got crushed when yen arbitrage positions started unwinding, then watched silver crater 20% in a single day. They tried doubling down to recover losses, the funding chain broke, and boom—complete collapse. These aren't crypto natives, so nobody was watching their on-chain footprint. White actually names names here. Avenir Group, the family office founded by Li Lin, is apparently the largest Bitcoin ETF holder in Asia—18.29 million IBIT shares, representing 87.6% of their portfolio. Yung Yung Asset Management, Ovata Capital, Monolith Management, and Andar Capital also hold Bitcoin spot ETFs, though smaller positions. But White's careful to note this is still speculation—13F filings won't confirm holdings until mid-May. He's also warning that if brokerages botch liquidation timing, balance sheet gaps could get ugly. Then there's the government dumping theory. Rumors have been flying about multiple governments offloading seized Bitcoin. Venezuela's been a hot topic—US military ops caught Maduro, and given Venezuela's economic collapse and sanctions, there's chatter they kept a shadow reserve of up to 600,000 BTC. Whether the US actually seized that is pure speculation though; no on-chain evidence backs it up. More concrete: the Chen Zhi arrest last October resulted in 127,000 BTC being frozen—the biggest crypto seizure in US history, worth 15 billion at the time. Scott Bessent recently confirmed the US government plans to keep seized Bitcoin rather than sell it, which should reduce selling pressure. But the UK's situation is different. Last November, British police broke up the largest Bitcoin money laundering ring in UK history, seizing 61,000 BTC from the mastermind Qian Zhimin. Combined, that's a lot of potential selling pressure hanging over the market. Except—and this is important—there's zero on-chain evidence of large-scale transfers or OTC sales. So this theory has some legs but lacks confirmation. The third angle is about what I'd call institutional cash crunch. These so-called deep pocket funds—sovereign wealth funds, massive pension plans, giant investment groups—are suddenly strapped. The easy money era of low inflation, low rates, and abundant liquidity is gone. Now in a high-rate environment, they're forced to liquidate to raise cash. The problem is they've dumped huge allocations into illiquid stuff: private equity, real estate, infrastructure. Invesco projects sovereign wealth funds will allocate 23% to illiquid alternatives by 2025, and converting that to cash takes forever. Meanwhile, AI's become this insane capital arms race. Sovereign wealth funds alone dropped 66 billion into AI and digital in 2025 alone. That's continuous, massive cash burn. When institutions face that kind of pressure, they sell what's easy to move—underperforming tech, crypto, hedge fund shares. As more forced sellers hit simultaneously, individual problems become systemic. That negative feedback loop keeps crushing risk assets, including Bitcoin. Finally, there's the crypto OG escape theory. Bitwise CEO Hunter Horsley thinks crypto natives and OGs are panic selling despite living through this cycle multiple times. Institutional players? They're thrilled—finally getting entry prices they missed two years ago, or even 50% discounts from four months back. Crypto KOL Ignas made a sharp observation: we're all reading Ray Dalio warnings about cycle endings, scrolling AI bubble posts, staring at unemployment data, seeing World War III panic… and what happens? The S&P 500 holds up fine but crypto crumbles first. We're dumping on each other. Here's the real insight though: crypto natives are emotional traders moving in lockstep. We spend 14 hours on crypto Twitter while boomers and institutions just hold. ETFs were supposed to bring different time horizons and position types, but the market's still retail-dominated. We think we're contrarian, but when every contrarian holds the same thesis, it's just consensus. The activation of Satoshi-era wallets last year triggered tens of thousands of BTC transfers, which fed the panic even if those moves were just address upgrades or custodian rotations. Recent analysis suggests OG selling pressure has actually eased though, with more holding behavior emerging. So which theory matters most? Probably all of them, working together. The yen carry trade unwinding is real macro pain. Hong Kong fund leverage issues would explain the sharp IBIT action. Government Bitcoin holdings exist but aren't flooding the market. Institutional liquidity crunches are forcing asset sales across the board. And crypto natives are definitely contributing panic selling. This isn't really a black swan event in the traditional sense—it's more like several medium-sized problems hitting at once, amplified by leverage and panic. The lack of a single obvious culprit is almost scarier than having one.
0
0
0
0
GasFeeCryer

GasFeeCryer

18 minutes ago
Recently, I’ve been seeing a lot of interesting news, and it feels like both the crypto and tech circles are undergoing changes. Doubao has officially announced its paid version, with three subscription tiers of 68, 200, and 500. It looks like the “free era” of large models really is coming to an end—complex tasks now require payment before you can use them. Daily token usage has also surpassed 1.2 million billion, and this scale definitely needs paid support to cover the computing cost. Even more interesting is the “Germany rise” happening in Korea. SK Hynix’s stock price jumped 12.5%, and its market cap first exceeded 1,000 trillion won. The Korean Composite Index also hit an all-time high. At the same time, I heard that Payward has completed its acquisition of Bitnomial, obtained full derivative licensing from the US CFTC, and also revealed that it previously received a $200 million investment from Deutsche Börse Group, which is currently in preparation for an IPO. It feels like the combination of traditional finance and crypto is getting closer and closer. In addition, Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another net inflow of $154 million last week, marking five consecutive weeks of net inflows. BlackRock’s IBIT has already accumulated total net inflows of $65.5 billion. The monthly spending volume of crypto payment cards has also risen to $600 million: 90% of transactions are completed via Visa, and the Solana ecosystem contributed $348 million in transaction volume. These data all seem to be saying one thing—crypto is moving from the fringe into the mainstream. However, next week, a number of tokens are scheduled to unlock, including ENA, OPN, and RED. There will be large unlock amounts. The value of ENA’s unlock is about $17.3 million, so it’s worth paying attention to how the market reacts.
0
0
0
0
GateUser-75ee51e7

GateUser-75ee51e7

26 minutes ago
Recently, I’ve noticed a very interesting phenomenon. Michael Saylor, the founder of MicroStrategy, made a bold prediction in a recent interview: major global banks are about to announce widespread adoption of Bitcoin. At first glance, it sounds like just another round of market hype, but if you look closely at his reasoning, it actually reflects a deep structural shift taking place in the traditional financial system. In the past, there was a very high wall running between the banking industry and the crypto market—compliance, trust, technology: all of them were problems. But once the US spot Bitcoin ETF was approved and hundreds of billions of dollars poured in, that wall began to crumble. More importantly, this change is not only being driven in North America—it is being advanced globally in sync. First, look at the US. Asset-management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity package Bitcoin into compliant financial products, directly threatening traditional banks’ wealth-management businesses. Major banks such as Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo face a stark reality: clients can already easily buy IBIT or FBTC through brokerage accounts. So if banks still refuse to provide related services, what they lose is not only transaction fees, but also outflow of core asset-management scale. That’s why they are quietly accelerating infrastructure development—authorizing participating parties, providing prime broker services, and building over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity pools. In fact, the wave of announcements Saylor predicted is the process of these banks turning behind-the-scenes moves into a publicly stated strategy. Europe’s story is different. After the MiCA law takes effect, European banking has gained clear operational guidelines. For traditional banks, “certainty” itself is the strongest catalyst. Standard Chartered has built the Zodia Custody custody platform and also entered spot Bitcoin trading; BNP Paribas and Société Générale are deeply involved in digital-asset custody; even long-established Swiss private banks such as Julius Baer have included crypto investments in standard services. European banks are not just treating Bitcoin as a speculative asset—they are positioning themselves to capture pricing power in the coming tokenization era by seizing the financial infrastructure. The Middle East follows another logic. Sovereign wealth funds seek diversification and hedging, viewing Bitcoin as “digital gold.” Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank and First Abu Dhabi Bank are building a complete ecosystem for fiat on-ramps, custody, and wealth management. Here, banks are not only trading channels—they are on the front lines of global allocation of national capital. Asia is the most interesting in this regard. Hong Kong has approved spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, and ZhongAn Bank has opened up the long-standing bottleneck for crypto inflows and outflows that has plagued the industry. In Singapore, DBS Bank’s digital trading platform has absorbed a large amount of institutional capital seeking a safe haven after the FTX collapse. In Japan, SBI Holdings is building a massive empire of crypto assets. The pragmatic nature of Asian banks is that they have captured the dividends of the Web3 economy, trying to bring core assets such as Bitcoin into the traditional banking system, and to strengthen their position as global wealth-management hubs. Putting these clues together, Saylor’s prediction becomes easy to understand. US asset-management pressure is pushing the change; Europe’s compliance advantages are creating opportunity; the Middle East is executing strategic allocations; and Asia is undergoing institutional restructuring. The global banking industry fully embracing Bitcoin has already formed into a clear pattern. This is not merely someone’s speculation, but a profound summary based on facts that have already occurred. Bitcoin adoption has already crossed the “event horizon,” becoming an irreversible structural shift. For those who want to seize future opportunities, understanding this new paradigm is crucial.
0
0
0
0