COST

Costco Wholesale Corp Price

COST
$993.65
-$15.00(-1.48%)

*Data last updated: 2026-05-11 18:11 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-05-11 18:11, Costco Wholesale Corp (COST) is priced at $993.65, with a total market cap of $447.55B, a P/E ratio of 51.71, and a dividend yield of 0.53%. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $971.68 and $1,009.94. The current price is 2.26% above the day's low and 1.61% below the day's high, with a trading volume of 1.80M. Over the past 52 weeks, COST has traded between $937.02 to $1,035.78, and the current price is -4.06% away from the 52-week high.

COST Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$1,012.06
Market Cap$447.55B
Volume1.80M
P/E Ratio51.71
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.53%
Dividend Amount$1.47
Diluted EPS (TTM)19.25
Net Income (FY)$8.09B
Revenue (FY)$275.23B
Earnings Date2026-07-29
EPS Estimate4.95
Revenue Estimate$68.69B
Shares Outstanding442.21M
Beta (1Y)0.908
Ex-Dividend Date2026-05-01
Dividend Payment Date2026-05-15

About COST

Costco Wholesale Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the operation of membership warehouses in the United States, Puerto Rico, Canada, the United Kingdom, Mexico, Japan, Korea, Australia, Spain, France, Iceland, China, and Taiwan. It offers branded and private-label products in a range of merchandise categories. The company offers sundries, dry groceries, candies, coolers, freezers, liquor, and tobacco and deli products; appliances, electronics, health and beauty aids, hardware, garden and patio products, sporting goods, tires, toys and seasonal products, office supplies, automotive care products, postages, tickets, apparel, small appliances, furniture, domestics, housewares, special order kiosks, and jewelry; and meat, produce, service deli, and bakery products. It also operates pharmacies, opticals, food courts, hearing-aid centers, and tire installation centers, as well as 636 gas stations; and offers business delivery, travel, same-day grocery, and various other services online in various countries. As of August 29, 2021, the company operated 815 membership warehouses, including 564 in the United States and Puerto Rico, 105 in Canada, 39 in Mexico, 30 in Japan, 29 in the United Kingdom, 16 in South Korea, 14 in Taiwan, 12 in Australia, 3 in Spain, 1 in Iceland, 1 in France, and 1 in China. It also operates e-commerce websites in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Mexico, South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, and Australia. The company was formerly known as Costco Companies, Inc. and changed its name to Costco Wholesale Corporation in August 1999. Costco Wholesale Corporation was founded in 1976 and is based in Issaquah, Washington.
SectorConsumer Defensive
IndustryDiscount Stores
CEORon Vachris
HeadquartersIssaquah,WA,US
Official Websitehttps://www.costco.com
Employees (FY)341.00K
Average Revenue (1Y)$807.14K
Net Income per Employee$23.75K

Learn More about Costco Wholesale Corp (COST)

Costco Wholesale Corp (COST) FAQ

What's the stock price of Costco Wholesale Corp (COST) today?

x
Costco Wholesale Corp (COST) is currently trading at $993.65, with a 24h change of -1.48%. The 52-week trading range is $937.02–$1,035.78.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Costco Wholesale Corp (COST)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Costco Wholesale Corp (COST)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Costco Wholesale Corp (COST)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Costco Wholesale Corp (COST)?

x

Should you buy or sell Costco Wholesale Corp (COST) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Costco Wholesale Corp (COST)?

x

How to buy Costco Wholesale Corp (COST) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Costco Wholesale Corp (COST) Latest News

2026-05-11 12:22MicroStrategy Increases Bitcoin Holdings by 535 BTC for ~$43M Last WeekAccording to Michael Saylor, MicroStrategy purchased 535 Bitcoin last week for approximately $43 million at an average price of $80,340 per BTC. As of May 10, 2026, the company holds a cumulative total of 818,869 BTC with a total acquisition cost of approximately $61.86 billion and an average cost basis of $75,540 per BTC.2026-05-11 08:44B.AI Fixes Credits Display Bug, Issues 30-Day Compensation to Affected UsersAccording to ChainCatcher, AI infrastructure platform B.AI discovered incomplete cost breakdown in historical Credits consumption records from May 1-3, 2026 (SGT). The platform's frontend display omitted underlying cache-related fees, showing only input/output token consumption. B.AI has corrected the data and automatically issued Credits compensation to affected accounts, valid for 30 days from receipt, requiring no user action.2026-05-11 08:21Baidu Releases Ernie 5.1 Model at 6% of Comparable Training CostAccording to Chosun Daily, Baidu released its Ernie 5.1 model today (May 11), delivering comparable performance to leading systems at about 6% of the pre-training cost of similar models. On the Arena benchmark, Ernie 5.1 ranked first among Chinese models and fourth overall, behind OpenAI's GPT-5.5 and Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.6 and 4.7.2026-05-11 03:58JPMorgan Forecasts Institutional Crypto Inflows to Drive 2026 Rally, Bitcoin Production Cost at $77KAccording to TheStreet and JPMorgan's analysis team led by Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou, the bank maintains a bullish outlook for the cryptocurrency market in 2026 despite recent volatility. JPMorgan expects institutional capital inflows and regulatory clarity to support digital asset gains, with the bank noting that 2026 growth will be "primarily driven by institutional investors." The bank estimates Bitcoin's production cost at approximately $77,000 per coin. If BTC trades significantly below this level for an extended period, some miners may exit the market, which could lower overall production costs and create a self-correcting mechanism.2026-05-11 03:58JPMorgan Sets Bitcoin Long-Term Price Target at $266,000 for 2026According to JPMorgan Chase analysts, Bitcoin's long-term price target is $266,000 based on a volatility-adjusted comparison with gold. The bank noted that recent hashrate declines were driven by severe winter weather in the U.S. and high-cost miners exiting the market, though hashrate recovery has already begun. Despite near-term volatility, JPMorgan's team remains optimistic on the 2026 crypto market, expecting institutional investors to drive growth.

Hot Posts About Costco Wholesale Corp (COST)

MarketSniper

MarketSniper

5 minutes ago
#CryptoMinersPivotToAIDC 🚨 CRYPTO MINERS PIVOT TO AI DATA CENTERS: A MAJOR INDUSTRY TRANSFORMATION MAY BE UNDERWAY 🚨 The crypto mining industry is beginning to experience one of its most important structural shifts in years as an increasing number of mining companies move beyond traditional Bitcoin operations and reposition themselves toward artificial intelligence infrastructure and AI-focused data centers. What initially appeared to be a temporary diversification strategy is now evolving into a much broader trend that could reshape how mining companies operate in the future. At first glance, the connection between Bitcoin mining and artificial intelligence may seem unusual. But beneath the surface, both industries rely heavily on the same critical resources: High-performance computing infrastructure Massive energy consumption Advanced cooling systems And large-scale data center operations Because of these similarities, many mining firms now see AI infrastructure as a natural expansion opportunity rather than a completely separate business model. The timing of this transition is also important. Crypto mining companies have faced increasingly difficult conditions over recent years. Bitcoin mining remains highly competitive, operational costs continue rising, and profitability fluctuates heavily depending on energy prices, market volatility, and Bitcoin’s price cycle itself. While major rallies can restore profitability quickly, long periods of uncertainty often create enormous pressure on mining operations, especially for companies carrying large infrastructure expenses. Artificial intelligence, meanwhile, has become one of the fastest-growing sectors in global technology. The rapid expansion of AI applications has created explosive demand for: GPU computing power Cloud infrastructure Data processing capacity And large-scale computational resources Major technology companies are aggressively investing billions into AI development, which has significantly increased the value of data center infrastructure capable of supporting machine learning workloads and advanced computing tasks. This creates an opportunity for crypto miners that already possess many of the physical resources needed to participate in this growing market. Large mining facilities often already operate with: Industrial-scale power access Cooling infrastructure Network connectivity And data center expertise Rather than relying entirely on Bitcoin mining revenue, companies are increasingly exploring how to repurpose or expand portions of their infrastructure toward AI-related services. In many cases, AI computing may provide more stable and predictable revenue streams compared to the highly cyclical nature of crypto mining alone. Another important factor driving this shift is investor perception. Publicly traded mining companies are under growing pressure to demonstrate long-term sustainability and adaptability. Pure crypto exposure can create extreme volatility in valuations because mining profitability remains closely tied to Bitcoin market cycles. By expanding into AI infrastructure, companies may attract broader investor interest from both technology and institutional sectors seeking exposure to artificial intelligence growth. This transition also reflects a larger trend happening across global markets: Infrastructure is becoming more valuable than speculation alone. Companies that control energy access, computing power, and scalable data systems are increasingly positioned at the center of future technological growth. Whether powering blockchain networks or artificial intelligence models, computational infrastructure itself is becoming one of the most strategically important assets in the digital economy. Energy plays a particularly important role in this transformation. Both Bitcoin mining and AI computing require enormous electricity consumption. As competition intensifies globally for computational capacity, access to reliable and cost-efficient energy becomes a major strategic advantage. Mining firms that previously focused entirely on maximizing Bitcoin hash power are now realizing their energy infrastructure may hold value far beyond crypto itself. At the same time, this pivot does not necessarily mean crypto mining is disappearing. Bitcoin mining remains a central part of the industry and continues playing a critical role in securing decentralized networks. Instead, what appears to be happening is diversification. Mining companies are evolving into broader infrastructure providers capable of supporting multiple high-performance computing industries simultaneously. This may ultimately create stronger long-term resilience for the sector. During periods where Bitcoin mining margins weaken, AI infrastructure demand could help stabilize revenue. Conversely, during strong crypto cycles, mining profitability may still remain highly attractive. By operating across both industries, companies potentially reduce dependence on a single volatile market environment. However, challenges remain significant. AI infrastructure is highly competitive and capital-intensive. Major technology firms already dominate much of the sector, and scaling successfully requires massive investment, technical expertise, and long-term operational efficiency. Not every mining company will successfully transition into AI-focused infrastructure providers. There is also the question of whether the current AI boom remains sustainable long term. Investor enthusiasm surrounding artificial intelligence has accelerated rapidly, and some analysts warn that expectations may eventually outpace realistic adoption timelines. If AI demand slows unexpectedly, companies heavily repositioning around the trend could face new financial pressure. Still, the broader direction appears increasingly clear: The lines between crypto infrastructure and advanced computing infrastructure are beginning to merge. What started as specialized Bitcoin mining operations are gradually evolving into multi-purpose computational ecosystems supporting some of the world’s fastest-growing technologies. This transformation may have major implications not only for crypto markets, but for the future relationship between blockchain technology, artificial intelligence, energy infrastructure, and digital economies overall. Because in the modern technological landscape, the companies controlling computing power may ultimately become just as important as the technologies themselves.
1
0
0
0
HypotheticalLiquidator

HypotheticalLiquidator

8 minutes ago
I just saw a quite interesting phenomenon: the U.S. tax authorities are entering a new phase of regulation on digital assets. Since last year, Form 1099-DA has become a "nightmare" for all trading platforms and Web3 participants—but to be honest, the logic behind this is actually worth studying. First, let's talk about the background. In 2021, the United States passed the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, officially including digital assets into the scope of tax reporting. After three years of preparation, the IRS finally released detailed rules in July 2024. Starting this year, this system has been fully operational, and trading platforms are required to report users' transaction data to the IRS. This is not just about a single form; it’s more like a "ledger revolution" for the entire crypto ecosystem. The most core change lies in granularity. The IRS is no longer satisfied with general transaction data but demands precise details about each transaction's nature. They introduced DTIF codes to standardize the identification of different tokens, and even set up separate reporting boxes for the original minting income of NFTs and secondary market transactions. Simply put, every transaction step must be clearly broken down. Interestingly, while the IRS enforces strict regulation, they also show flexibility. They set differentiated exemption thresholds: transactions processed by payment processors under $600 do not need to be reported; qualified stablecoins exceeding $10,000 annually require reporting; NFT transactions over $600 are reportable. The core logic of this design is to filter out massive amounts of retail consumption data, avoiding overwhelming the tax system with small transactions like coffee money. For stablecoins and NFTs using simplified reporting methods, brokers can report in aggregate rather than per transaction. What does this mean? For users, data governance becomes essential. Casual trading and chaotic bookkeeping are no longer viable. Whether using self-custody tools like Revolution Wallet or trading on platforms, every operation will be recorded. If you want to stay compliant, you need to develop clear accounting habits from now on. For platform and wallet developers, this is a bigger challenge. They need to improve data collection and reporting systems to ensure accurate tracking of cost basis (although reporting is voluntary this year, it will be mandatory next year). Some platforms are already upgrading their Revolution Wallets and account systems, adding automated tax data export features to help users more easily meet reporting requirements. Another detail worth noting: the IRS explicitly states that the 1099-DA forms in 2025 will not participate in the federal and state joint filing plan. This means platforms may need to submit data separately to different state tax authorities. This will further increase compliance costs, but in the long run, it’s also preparing for the U.S. to join the OECD’s global crypto asset reporting framework (CARF). From a global perspective, this is not just a unilateral move by the U.S. The OECD had already released the CARF framework in 2022, with over 40 countries committed to implementation. If the U.S. truly integrates into this system, it means the U.S. tax authorities can access account information of U.S. taxpayers on overseas exchanges. This will have profound implications for the global crypto ecosystem. For Web3 practitioners and high-net-worth investors, it’s no longer a question of "whether to comply" but "how to comply more efficiently." Upgrading from chaotic bookkeeping to a clear tax system requires good tools—whether self-custody solutions like Revolution Wallet or data management features provided by platforms. Whoever completes this upgrade first will be able to maintain competitiveness amid the wave of transparent regulation. In short, the launch of 1099-DA marks a turning point. Crypto assets are moving from wild growth to institutionalization, which is both a challenge and an opportunity for the entire ecosystem.
0
0
0
0